Administrators, commonly known as admins or sysops (system operators), are Memory Alpha users who the community has granted access to certain tools that are restricted from the general public, such as the ability to block users and delete pages.[note 1] Administrative tools should be used to uphold Memory Alpha's policies and guidelines, protect the wiki from vandalism, and perform maintenance tasks. They should never be used to gain an unfair advantage in a dispute.
Becoming an administrator
For a wiki, the more administrators that participate in the system, the better. If you believe that a fellow archivist would make a good administrator, you can add their name to the list of nominations for administratorship. You cannot nominate yourself for adminship.
Aside from being an autoconfirmed user, there are no strict standards candidates must meet. However, a candidate is most likely to gain support if they have actively participated in the development of the encyclopedia for some time and are a recognized member of the community. It's also best for candidates to exhibit a good understanding of Memory Alpha's policies and guidelines and to have a high quality and quantity of contributions.
Once a nomination is filed, any autoconfirmed user[note 2] may vote on it and participate in the discussion. A rationale must be provided with each vote. Any votes with no clear connection to the candidate's performance on Memory Alpha during the last two years are considered invalid.[note 3]
Voting must remain open for at least seven days. Nominations are considered successful if (1) support is unanimous among valid votes, (2) there are at least four valid support votes, and (3) the candidate cast a valid support vote. All other nominations are considered unsuccessful.
Members may be re-nominated after a one-month waiting period following the date of the rejection of the previous nomination. There is no limit to the number of times a member may be nominated. Nominations for members who are obviously new and/or unqualified may be rejected before the voting cycle is completed.
Removal of tools
There are two ways in which users may loose their administrative tools.
- Users may voluntarily give up their tools. In this case, they should remove themselves from any administrative user groups via Special:UserRights – they should not request this be done by others.
- Administrative tools may be removed from accounts that have been inactive for five years or more (these users are marked as "inactive" in the list below). This is entirely a housekeeping procedure and may be reversed at the request of the user in question.
List
This table includes all users who currently hold administrative tools on Memory Alpha, listed by language edition.
| User | Role(s) | Edits | Last edited | Language | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Language | Bureaucrat | Sysop | Content moderator | Quick answers editor | Rollback | Bot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bg | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| ca | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| cs | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| de | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| en | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| eo | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| es | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| fr | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| it | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| ja | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| nl | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| pl | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| pt | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| ro | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| ru | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| sr | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| sv | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| uk | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| zh | list | list | list | list | list | list |
| mu | list | list | list | list | list | list |
See also
Notes
- ↑ Administrators are one of several user groups with access to extra tools. Each group has a different set of tools, although many overlap.
- ↑ This includes the candidate and the nominator.
- ↑ If a support vote provides no rationale, the rationale is presumed to be the same as that given by the nominator at the start of the discussion. Thus, such votes are considered valid so long as the nominator's vote is.